Home › Ground lease vs. mezzanine
Ground lease vs. mezzanine

Why a ground lease beats mezzanine.

Both fill the gap above the senior loan — but a ground lease does it cheaper, with no maturity wall, no intercreditor, and no dilution. And it reaches the land value a mezz lender never touches. We buy the land; you keep the building and 100% of the upside.

Mezz amortizes against a balloon. A ground lease never matures.
~6–6.75%
Ground rent · non-amortizing
vs
low–mid teens
Mezzanine · amortizing, with a balloon
On $5M of gap capital, that spread is real money the sponsor keeps every year — and a ground lease carries no balloon, so there’s no second refinancing event to underwrite. It also monetizes the land value a mezz lender cannot reach, which often means more proceeds, not just cheaper ones.
Side by side

Ground lease vs. mezzanine, line by line.

Valor ground lease Mezzanine financing
Annual carry ~6–6.75%, non-amortizing ground rent. Low-to-mid teens, often with amortization or an accruing PIK component on top.
Maturity No maturity wall — a long-term, typically 99-year, lease; nothing to refinance. Short term with a balloon — a second refinancing event you have to underwrite and clear.
Intercreditor None — the land isn’t your collateral, so there’s no second lender to paper an intercreditor with. An intercreditor agreement with the senior lender — slow, negotiated, and a frequent deal-killer.
Dilution / control Non-dilutive — no warrants, no equity kicker, no board or approval rights. Often carries warrants, an equity kicker, or springing control on a default.
What it reaches The land value too — monetizes the dirt a mezz loan sized off the building never touches. Sizes off the leverage gap on the improvements; the land equity stays trapped.
Accounting & tax 100% deductible operating rent — treated as rent, not stacked debt. Stacked debt with a debt-service line and limited deductibility on PIK accruals.
Your upside 100% kept — you own the building, the cash flow, and the appreciation. Shared via warrants or kicker, and at risk if the balloon can’t be refinanced.

And: fixed and non-amortizing — no balloon, no maturity wall · no intercreditor to negotiate with your senior lender · one principal counterparty for the land and the leasehold financing.

Questions, answered

Ground lease vs. mezzanine — FAQ.

Is a ground lease cheaper than mezzanine financing?

Usually, and by a wide margin. A ground lease monetizes the land value at a non-amortizing ground rent of about 6 to 6.75%, while mezzanine debt typically prices in the low-to-mid teens and often amortizes or accrues PIK on top. The carry difference compounds every year, and the ground lease has no balloon to refinance.

Does a ground lease need an intercreditor agreement?

No. Mezzanine debt sits behind the senior loan and requires a negotiated intercreditor agreement, which is slow and frequently kills deals. A ground lease isn't a second lien on your collateral, so there's no intercreditor to paper. That alone can be the difference between closing and not.

Is a ground lease dilutive like mezz can be?

No. Mezzanine financing often carries warrants, an equity kicker, or springing control rights on a default. A ground lease is non-dilutive: it's rent on the land, with no warrants, no kicker, and no board or approval rights. You keep 100% of the promote and the upside.

Why does a ground lease reach more value than mezz?

Mezzanine debt sizes off the leverage gap on the improvements, so the land equity stays trapped. A ground lease monetizes the land directly, which is typically 30 to 40% of basis. On a land-heavy deal that often means more proceeds, not just a lower carry.

Send us the deal

We move on real numbers.

Deals where you’d otherwise reach for mezz — especially land-heavy assets, a tight intercreditor, or a balloon you’d rather not create. Send the address, the as-complete stabilized NOI, and total project cost — we return an indicative land value in 48 hours, as principal or arranged capital.

Email us the deal