Your client wants to sell the land under their building and lease it back for 99 years. The analysis is cleaner than it first looks: no recapture (land never depreciated), unchanged depreciation on the building they keep, deductible rent, and a 1031-eligible sale. Here is the six-item checklist, in the order to run it.
| Item | The analysis |
|---|---|
| 1. Basis allocation | Gain = land price minus the land's allocated basis from the original purchase-price allocation. The allocation controls everything; pull it first. |
| 2. Character of gain | Long-term capital gain (assuming the holding period). No §1250 recapture — that attaches to the improvements, which the client keeps, where it stays dormant. |
| 3. True lease vs. financing | The lease must be a true lease, not a disguised financing: market-consistent rent, no bargain repurchase, genuine transfer of the fee. Institutional 99-year ground leases are drafted squarely on the true-lease side; review the actual terms. |
| 4. Rent deductibility | Ground rent under a true lease is an ordinary and necessary expense of the property — a new deduction the client did not have. |
| 5. Depreciation continuity | The building's depreciable basis, method, convention, and remaining life continue unchanged. Nothing about the land sale touches the improvements' schedule. |
| 6. The 1031 option | The leased-fee is real property; the land proceeds can ride a standard exchange (QI before closing, 45/180). If the client skips the exchange, the tax bill is modest for the reasons above — run both. |
The buyer-side footnote (when a client asks about owning the land position instead): land-rent income is generally recharacterized as non-passive under Reg. 1.469-2T(f)(3) when under 30% of basis is depreciable — it will not absorb passive losses. Full detail on our leased-fee buyer page.
No. Section 1250 recapture attaches to depreciated improvements; land was never depreciable and has no recapture exposure. The recapture the client has accrued stays dormant in the building they keep.
Yes, under a true lease — ordinary and necessary operating expense. The true-lease analysis (market rent, no bargain repurchase, genuine fee transfer) should be confirmed against the actual lease terms; institutional 99-year forms are drafted for it.
No — basis, method, and remaining life continue exactly as before. Per dollar of equity remaining in the deal, the client's sheltering ratio improves, since the same deductions sit on less invested capital.
Yes — the land is real property and exchanges under the normal rules: qualified intermediary in place before closing, 45-day identification, 180-day completion. Model the exchange against the modest straight-sale tax bill; sometimes the simple sale wins.
Send the questions — structure, lease terms, the true-lease analysis. We work with advisors early because deals close cleaner that way. Not tax advice; your analysis controls.
Email us the property